ITR-6 Is Mandatory for Every Indian Company — And the Audit Deadline Is Not Negotiable. Every private limited company, public limited company, and one person company in India must file ITR-6 under Section 139(1) every assessment year. There is no small-company exemption. The consequences of missing the October 31 deadline are mechanical. Interest under Sections 234A and 234B on outstanding tax accrues. Prosecution under Section 276C applies for deliberate non-filing. What makes the deadline genuinely difficult is that it depends on the tax audit being completed first. The audit report — Form 3CA or 3CD — must be prepared by the statutory auditor. It must be approved by the board. It must be attached to the ITR-6 filing. If the auditor finishes in October, there is no time left for the tax team.
FinTax24 begins ITR-6 coordination in April, before the year closes. This gives the audit and tax work tracks enough slack to complete without rushing each other. The process covers the full scope: ITR-6 preparation and e-filing, Section 44AB tax audit coordination, Minimum Alternate Tax computation under Section 115JB, and AO representation if the filing triggers a scrutiny notice.
The Section 44AB Tax Audit — Where the Real Deadline Lives
Any company with turnover, gross receipts, or profits exceeding the Section 44AB threshold requires a tax audit by a practising tax professional. The audit produces Form 3CA or Form 3CD, along with an audited financial statement. The ITR-6 cannot be filed without the audit report. If the auditor delivers in late September, the tax team has days to complete the ITR-6. That schedule produces errors in classification, missed deductions, and incorrect schedules.
A Rajkot pharmaceutical company's experience illustrates the risk. Their auditor completed the audit in the last week of September. The ITR-6 filed in a rush omitted a Section 80-IA deduction the company was legitimately entitled to. The error surfaced as a demand under Section 143(3) scrutiny four months later. It required a formal reply with supporting evidence. FinTax24's approach is to have the complete tax computation agreed with the auditor by July. When the audited financials arrive, the ITR-6 is prepared from a finished template rather than assembled under pressure.
MAT, Transfer Pricing, and the Decisions That Have to Be Made Before Filing
Minimum Alternate Tax under Section 115JB applies when a company's book profit produces a higher tax than the regular corporate tax rate. The difference is MAT. It is carried forward as a credit to be used against future tax. FinTax24 tracks the eight-year carryforward window as part of the engagement. It is not unusual for a company to have MAT credits expiring unused because nobody was watching the window.
Companies with international related-party transactions also require a transfer pricing report under Section 92E. This is not an add-on to the main filing. It is a precondition. Omitting it or filing with an incorrect arm's length price exposes the company to a transfer pricing adjustment and penalty under Section 271AA.
The ₹4,999 fee covers ITR-6 preparation, e-filing, and Section 44AB audit coordination. MAT computation, Section 115BAA or 115BAB regime election, and Section 92E transfer pricing coordination are billed separately based on complexity. All fees are discussed and agreed before the engagement begins.